linux-kernel - Re: arm64: allwinner: Add support for TERES I laptop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1ewlhQ-0000Jx-6s@stardust.g4.wien.funkfeuer.at>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:30:55 +0100
From:   Harald Geyer <harald@...ib.org>
To:     afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
cc:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>, info@...mex.com
Subject: Re: arm64: allwinner: Add support for TERES I laptop

Hi,

afzal mohammed writes:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 04:10:45PM +0000, Harald Geyer wrote:
> > This series adds support for the TERES I open hardware laptop produced
> > by olimex. With these patches and a bootloader capable of setting up
> > simple framebuffer the laptop is quite useable.
> 
> Thanks for the patches
> 
> w/ defconfig could reach to prompt via serial console using audio
> jack.
> 
> And just by enabling PWM_SUN4I & FB_SIMPLE, laptop could function
> standalone as well.
> 
> Suggestions (feel free to ignore):
> 
> 1. seems currently only review comment pending is on simple
> framebuffer, perhaps you can proceed removing just that so that a
> basic bootable system can be achieved at the earliest (iiuc, anyway
> drm would be the final solution for display)

I'm under the impression that I addressed the concerns regarding simplefb
satisfactorily. But yes: I hope to get this merged in time for 4.17.
If simplefb is a problem for that, I'd rather drop it then postpone
the entire series.

Thanks for testing,
Harald