[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180316113917.GA21303@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:39:18 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, acme@...nel.org,
ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, alexis.berlemont@...il.com,
corbet@....net, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
hughd@...gle.com, jack@...e.cz, jglisse@...hat.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, kjlx@...pleofstupid.com,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.com,
milian.wolff@...b.com, mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pc@...ibm.com,
pombredanne@...b.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, willy@...radead.org,
yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] trace_uprobe: Support SDT markers having reference
count (semaphore)
On 03/16, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
> On 03/15/2018 08:00 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Note to mention that sdt_find_vma() can return NULL but the callers do
> > vma_offset_to_vaddr(vma) without any check.
>
> If the "mm" we are passing to sdt_find_vma() is returned by
> uprobe_build_map_info(ref_ctr_offset), sdt_find_vma() must
> _not_ return NULL.
Not at all.
Once build_map_info() returns any mapping can go away. Otherwise, why do
you think the caller has to take ->mmap_sem and use find_vma()? If you
were right, build_map_info() could just return the list of vma's instead
of list of mm's.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists