linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix device passthrough when SME is active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <505b4128-2336-7d81-791a-6e95acdd2a62@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:29:07 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix device passthrough when SME is active

On 09/03/2018 00:17, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> When using device passthrough with SME active, the MMIO range that is
> mapped for the device should not be mapped encrypted.  Add a check in
> set_spte() to insure that a page is not mapped encrypted if that page
> is a device MMIO page as indicated by kvm_is_mmio_pfn().
> 
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.14.x-
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index f551962..763bb3b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2770,8 +2770,10 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
>  	else
>  		pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
>  
> +	if (!kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn))
> +		spte |= shadow_me_mask;
> +
>  	spte |= (u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	spte |= shadow_me_mask;
>  
>  	if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) {
>  
> 

No, I'm applying it.

Paolo