[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180316143550.GH4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:35:50 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Rohit Jain <rohit.k.jain@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, joelaf@...gle.com, jbacik@...com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, dhaval.giani@...cle.com, efault@....de,
riel@...riel.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] sched/fair: Remove check in idle_balance
against migration_cost
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:36:47AM -0700, Rohit Jain wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Jain <rohit.k.jain@...cle.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Jain <rohit.k.jain@...cle.com>
Surely you only need a single on of those.
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 5eb3ffc..569ea83 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8804,8 +8804,7 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
> */
> rq_unpin_lock(this_rq, rf);
>
> - if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost ||
> - !this_rq->rd->overload) {
> + if (!this_rq->rd->overload) {
> rcu_read_lock();
> sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(this_rq->sd);
> if (sd)
I don't think that actually works right on the current tree. In
particular look at commit:
31e77c93e432 ("sched/fair: Update blocked load when newly idle")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists