[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1803161547400.1598@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:47:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, luto@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/36] x86/ioport: add ksys_ioperm() helper; remove
in-kernel calls to sys_ioperm()
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:00:48PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> >
> > > Using this helper allows us to avoid the in-kernel calls to the sys_ioperm()
> > > syscall.
> > >
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > > Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
> > > Cc: x86@...nel.org
> > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
> >
> > Please add a few lines explaining the ksys_ prefix as you did in your reply
> > to Christoph. Other than that:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Thanks! The commit message now reads
>
> Using this helper allows us to avoid the in-kernel calls to the sys_ioperm()
> syscall. The ksys_ prefix denotes that this function is meant as a drop-in
> replacement for the syscall. In particular, it uses the same calling
> convention as sys_ioperm().
>
> Does that sound OK?
Looks good.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists