lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1521168966-5245-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 19:56:06 -0700
From:   Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
        Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>,
        Daniel Vacek <neelx@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>, Jia He <jia.he@...-semitech.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm/memblock.c: hardcode the end_pfn being -1"

This reverts commit 379b03b7fa05f7db521b7732a52692448a3c34fe.

Commit 864b75f9d6b0 ("mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock
alignment") introduced boot hang issues in arm/arm64 machines, so
Ard Biesheuvel reverted in commit 3e04040df6d4. But there is a
preparation patch for commit 864b75f9d6b0. So just revert it for
the sake of caution.

Signed-off-by: Jia He <jia.he@...-semitech.com>
---
 mm/memblock.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index b6ba6b7..5a9ca2a 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn,
 	struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
 	unsigned int right = type->cnt;
 	unsigned int mid, left = 0;
-	phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn);
+	phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + 1);
 
 	do {
 		mid = (right + left) / 2;
@@ -1118,15 +1118,15 @@ unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn,
 				  type->regions[mid].size))
 			left = mid + 1;
 		else {
-			/* addr is within the region, so pfn is valid */
-			return pfn;
+			/* addr is within the region, so pfn + 1 is valid */
+			return min(pfn + 1, max_pfn);
 		}
 	} while (left < right);
 
 	if (right == type->cnt)
-		return -1UL;
+		return max_pfn;
 	else
-		return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base);
+		return min(PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base), max_pfn);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ