linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 073/109] perf annotate: Fix objdump comment parsing for Intel mov dissassembly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180316152333.957937973@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:23:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 073/109] perf annotate: Fix objdump comment parsing for Intel mov dissassembly

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>


[ Upstream commit 35a8a148d8c1ee9e5ae18f9565a880490f816f89 ]

The command 'perf annotate' parses the output of objdump and also
investigates the comments produced by objdump. For example the
output of objdump produces (on x86):

23eee:  4c 8b 3d 13 01 21 00 mov 0x210113(%rip),%r15
                                # 234008 <stderr@@GLIBC_2.2.5+0x9a8>

and the function mov__parse() is called to investigate the complete
line. Mov__parse() breaks this line into several parts and finally
calls function comment__symbol() to parse the data after the comment
character '#'. Comment__symbol() expects a hexadecimal address followed
by a symbol in '<' and '>' brackets.

However the 2nd parameter given to function comment__symbol()
always points to the comment character '#'. The address parsing
always returns 0 because the character '#' is not a digit and
strtoull() fails without being noticed.

Fix this by advancing the second parameter to function comment__symbol()
by one byte before invocation and add an error check after strtoull()
has been called.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Fixes: 6de783b6f50f ("perf annotate: Resolve symbols using objdump comment")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128075632.72182-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/annotate.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ static int comment__symbol(char *raw, ch
 		return 0;
 
 	*addrp = strtoull(comment, &endptr, 16);
+	if (endptr == comment)
+		return 0;
 	name = strchr(endptr, '<');
 	if (name == NULL)
 		return -1;
@@ -436,8 +438,8 @@ static int mov__parse(struct arch *arch,
 		return 0;
 
 	comment = ltrim(comment);
-	comment__symbol(ops->source.raw, comment, &ops->source.addr, &ops->source.name);
-	comment__symbol(ops->target.raw, comment, &ops->target.addr, &ops->target.name);
+	comment__symbol(ops->source.raw, comment + 1, &ops->source.addr, &ops->source.name);
+	comment__symbol(ops->target.raw, comment + 1, &ops->target.addr, &ops->target.name);
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -481,7 +483,7 @@ static int dec__parse(struct arch *arch
 		return 0;
 
 	comment = ltrim(comment);
-	comment__symbol(ops->target.raw, comment, &ops->target.addr, &ops->target.name);
+	comment__symbol(ops->target.raw, comment + 1, &ops->target.addr, &ops->target.name);
 
 	return 0;
 }