linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.15 030/128] HID: multitouch: Only look at non touch fields in first packet of a frame

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180316152338.045316429@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:22:51 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.15 030/128] HID: multitouch: Only look at non touch fields in first packet of a frame

4.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>


[ Upstream commit 55746d28d66860bccaae20a67b55b9d5db7c14af ]

Devices in "single finger hybrid mode" will send one report per finger,
on some devices only the first report of such a multi-packet frame will
contain a value for BTN_LEFT, in subsequent reports (if multiple fingers
are down) the value is always 0, causing hid-mt to report BTN_LEFT going
1 - 0 - 1 - 0 when pressing a clickpad and putting down a second finger.
This happens for example on USB 0603:0002 mt touchpads.

This commit fixes this by only reporting non touch fields for the first
packet of a (possibly) multi-packet frame.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index 65ea23be9677..397592959238 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -778,9 +778,11 @@ static int mt_touch_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
 }
 
 static void mt_process_mt_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
-				struct hid_usage *usage, __s32 value)
+				struct hid_usage *usage, __s32 value,
+				bool first_packet)
 {
 	struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hid);
+	__s32 cls = td->mtclass.name;
 	__s32 quirks = td->mtclass.quirks;
 	struct input_dev *input = field->hidinput->input;
 
@@ -837,6 +839,15 @@ static void mt_process_mt_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
 			break;
 
 		default:
+			/*
+			 * For Win8 PTP touchpads we should only look at
+			 * non finger/touch events in the first_packet of
+			 * a (possible) multi-packet frame.
+			 */
+			if ((cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8 || cls == MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL) &&
+			    !first_packet)
+				return;
+
 			if (usage->type)
 				input_event(input, usage->type, usage->code,
 						value);
@@ -856,6 +867,7 @@ static void mt_touch_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
 {
 	struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hid);
 	struct hid_field *field;
+	bool first_packet;
 	unsigned count;
 	int r, n;
 
@@ -874,6 +886,7 @@ static void mt_touch_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
 			td->num_expected = value;
 	}
 
+	first_packet = td->num_received == 0;
 	for (r = 0; r < report->maxfield; r++) {
 		field = report->field[r];
 		count = field->report_count;
@@ -883,7 +896,7 @@ static void mt_touch_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
 
 		for (n = 0; n < count; n++)
 			mt_process_mt_event(hid, field, &field->usage[n],
-					field->value[n]);
+					    field->value[n], first_packet);
 	}
 
 	if (td->num_received >= td->num_expected)
-- 
2.16.2