[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180317133445.772733ac@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:34:45 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Vikram Sethi <vikrams@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip/gic-v3: Ensure GICR_CTLR.EnableLPI=0 is
observed before enabling
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:31:27 -0500
Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> The definition of the GICR_CTLR.RWP control bit was expanded to indicate
> status of changing GICR_CTLR.EnableLPI from 1 to 0 is being in progress
> or completed. Software must observe GICR_CTLR.RWP==0 after clearing
> GICR_CTLR.EnableLPI from 1 to 0 and before writing GICR_PENDBASER and/or
> GICR_PROPBASER, otherwise behavior is UNPREDICTABLE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> -Moved LPI disable code to a seperate function as Marc suggested.
> -Mark's suggestion to use readl_relaxed_poll_timeout() helper functions.
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index 1d3056f..cba71a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/percpu.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/time64.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>
> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
> @@ -1875,16 +1877,6 @@ static void its_cpu_init_lpis(void)
> gic_data_rdist()->pend_page = pend_page;
> }
>
> - /* Disable LPIs */
> - val = readl_relaxed(rbase + GICR_CTLR);
> - val &= ~GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS;
> - writel_relaxed(val, rbase + GICR_CTLR);
> -
> - /*
> - * Make sure any change to the table is observable by the GIC.
> - */
> - dsb(sy);
> -
> /* set PROPBASE */
> val = (page_to_phys(gic_rdists->prop_page) |
> GICR_PROPBASER_InnerShareable |
> @@ -3288,13 +3280,59 @@ static bool gic_rdists_supports_plpis(void)
> return !!(gic_read_typer(gic_data_rdist_rd_base() + GICR_TYPER) & GICR_TYPER_PLPIS);
> }
>
> +static int redist_disable_lpis(void)
> +{
> + void __iomem *rbase = gic_data_rdist_rd_base();
> + u64 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!gic_rdists_supports_plpis()) {
> + pr_info("CPU%d: LPIs not supported\n", smp_processor_id());
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(rbase + GICR_CTLR);
> + if (!(val & GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Disable LPIs */
> + val &= ~GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS;
> + writel_relaxed(val, rbase + GICR_CTLR);
> +
> + /* Make sure any change to GICR_CTLR is observable by the GIC */
> + dsb(sy);
> +
> + /* Wait for GICR_CTLR.GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS==0 or timeout */
> + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(rbase + GICR_CTLR, val,
> + !(val & GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS), 1,
> + USEC_PER_SEC);
Why do you need to poll on EnableLPIs? It is supposed to be immediately
written. It seems to me that the sequence should be:
- Check EnableLPis
- If set to 1, scream about bootloader being braindead
- Write EnableLPIs to 0
- Read back EnableLpis:
- If still set 1, bail out, we're doomed. Scream about the HW being
braindead
- Poll RWP
- If timeout, bail out, the HW has locked up. Scream again.
I think this should cover the whole thing. An alternative would be to
place the poll between the write and read-back, but that doesn't change
anything.
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("CPU%d: Failed to disable LPIs\n", smp_processor_id());
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + /* Wait for GICR_CTLR.RWP==0 or timeout */
> + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(rbase + GICR_CTLR, val,
> + !(val & GICR_CTLR_RWP), 1,
> + USEC_PER_SEC);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("CPU%d: Failed to observe RWP==0 after enabling LPIs\n",
> + smp_processor_id());
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int its_cpu_init(void)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> if (!list_empty(&its_nodes)) {
nit: move 'ret' here.
> - if (!gic_rdists_supports_plpis()) {
> - pr_info("CPU%d: LPIs not supported\n", smp_processor_id());
> - return -ENXIO;
> - }
> + ret = redist_disable_lpis();
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> its_cpu_init_lpis();
> its_cpu_init_collection();
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index c00c4c33..4d5fb60 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
> #define GICR_PIDR2 GICD_PIDR2
>
> #define GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS (1UL << 0)
> +#define GICR_CTLR_RWP (1UL << 3)
>
> #define GICR_TYPER_CPU_NUMBER(r) (((r) >> 8) & 0xffff)
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists