[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5BzE46Dm24++j+xVA4KGFnpsopGfJ97h7sFGOAxVa19=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:53:08 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
Cc: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <Linux-imx@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: pfuze3000: update sw1a/vldo4 voltage range
Hi Anson,
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com> wrote:
> Update sw1a/vldo4's voltage range according to latest pfuze3000
> datasheet from:
>
> http://cache.freescale.com/files/analog/doc/data_sheet/PF3000.pdf?fsrch=1&sr=1&pageNum=1
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d-cl-som-imx7.dts | 4 ++--
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d-nitrogen7.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d-sdb.dts | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo.dtsi
> index 53b3eac..1de0a0f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo.dtsi
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
> regulators {
> sw1a_reg: sw1a {
> regulator-min-microvolt = <700000>;
> - regulator-max-microvolt = <1475000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
This change does not look like a safe thing to do without carefully
checking each one of the board schematics.
Even if the regulator itself is capable of driving a higher voltage,
it does not mean that the circuitry that consumes such regulator is
allowed to receive the higher voltages.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists