[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1521384808-23627-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 22:53:28 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: devel@...uxdriverproject.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pci: host: pci-hyperv: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in new_pcichild_device
new_pcichild_device() is not called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at new_pcichild_device() is:
[1] new_pcichild_device() <- pci_devices_present_work()
pci_devices_present_work() is only set in INIT_WORK().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
new_pcichild_device() calls kzalloc with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL
to avoid busy waiting.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
index 0fe3ea1..289e31d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ static struct hv_pci_dev *new_pcichild_device(struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus,
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
- hpdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*hpdev), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ hpdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*hpdev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!hpdev)
return NULL;
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists