[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000801d3bece$0e4b9090$2ae2b1b0$@net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 08:30:29 -0700
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
To: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"'Thomas Ilsche'" <thomas.ilsche@...dresden.de>
Cc: "'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"'Linux PM'" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Frederic Weisbecker'" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"'Paul McKenney'" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"'Rik van Riel'" <riel@...riel.com>,
"'Aubrey Li'" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"'Mike Galbraith'" <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
Subject: RE: [RFT][PATCH v5 0/7] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework
On 2018.03.18 04:01 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Below is a drop-in v6 replacement for patch [4/7].
>
> With this new patch applied instead of the [4/7] the behavior should be much
> more in line with the v4 behavior, so please try it if you can and let me know
> if that really is the case on your systems.
Yes, the idle power is back down to V4 levels. (I did not do a new graph).
Some other data from this week (7 patch set + poll fix verses kernel 4.16-rc5):
pipe-test: The not cross core test is the most dramatic. Using CPU's 3 and 7,
or core 3, uses 6% less power and 18% performance improvement.
Graphs:
http://fast.smythies.com/pipe-test-one-core-power.png
http://fast.smythies.com/pipe-test-one-core-times.png
A couple of Phoronix tests (I didn't get very far yet):
himeno: 11% performance improvement; 14% less power.
compress-lzma: small performance improvement; small power improvement.
mafft: performance similar; small power improvement.
... Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists