[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180319155742.13731-244-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:02:43 +0000
From: Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Jag Raman <jag.raman@...cle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 244/281] sparc64: ldc abort during vds iso
boot
From: Jag Raman <jag.raman@...cle.com>
[ Upstream commit 6c95483b768c62f8ee933ae08a1bdbcb78b5410f ]
Orabug: 20902628
When an ldc control-only packet is received during data exchange in
read_nonraw(), a new rx head is calculated but the rx queue head is not
actually advanced (rx_set_head() is not called) and a branch is taken to
'no_data' at which point two things can happen depending on the value
of the newly calculated rx head and the current rx tail:
- If the rx queue is determined to be not empty, then the wrong packet
is picked up.
- If the rx queue is determined to be empty, then a read error (EAGAIN)
is eventually returned since it is falsely assumed that more data was
expected.
The fix is to update the rx head and return in case of a control only
packet during data exchange.
Signed-off-by: Jagannathan Raman <jag.raman@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Young <aaron.young@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Bijan Mottahedeh <bijan.mottahedeh@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
---
arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
index 59d503866431..9cc600b2d68c 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
@@ -1733,9 +1733,14 @@ static int read_nonraw(struct ldc_channel *lp, void *buf, unsigned int size)
lp->rcv_nxt = p->seqid;
+ /*
+ * If this is a control-only packet, there is nothing
+ * else to do but advance the rx queue since the packet
+ * was already processed above.
+ */
if (!(p->type & LDC_DATA)) {
new = rx_advance(lp, new);
- goto no_data;
+ break;
}
if (p->stype & (LDC_ACK | LDC_NACK)) {
err = data_ack_nack(lp, p);
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists