linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 077/134] pwm: tegra: Increase precision in PWM rate calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180319171900.407368935@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:06:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 077/134] pwm: tegra: Increase precision in PWM rate calculation

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>


[ Upstream commit 250b76f43f57d578ebff5e7211eb2c73aa5cd6ca ]

The rate of the PWM calculated as follows:

	hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns;
 	rate = (rate + (hz / 2)) / hz;

This has the precision loss in lower PWM rate.

Change this to have more precision as:

	hz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC * 100, period_ns);
	rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * 100, hz)

Example:

1. period_ns = 16672000, PWM clock rate is 200 KHz.

	Based on old formula
		hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns
		   = 1000000000ul/16672000
		   = 59 (59.98)
		rate = (200K + 59/2)/59 = 3390

	Based on new method:
		hz = 5998
		rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSE(200000*100, 5998) = 3334

	If we measure the PWM signal rate, we will get more accurate
	period with rate value of 3334 instead of 3390.

2.  period_ns = 16803898, PWM clock rate is 200 KHz.

	Based on old formula:
		hz = 59, rate = 3390

	Based on new formula:
		hz = 5951, rate = 3360

	The PWM signal rate of 3360 is more near to requested period
	than 3333.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static int tegra_pwm_config(struct pwm_c
 	struct tegra_pwm_chip *pc = to_tegra_pwm_chip(chip);
 	unsigned long long c;
 	unsigned long rate, hz;
+	unsigned long long ns100 = NSEC_PER_SEC;
 	u32 val = 0;
 	int err;
 
@@ -87,9 +88,11 @@ static int tegra_pwm_config(struct pwm_c
 	 * cycles at the PWM clock rate will take period_ns nanoseconds.
 	 */
 	rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk) >> PWM_DUTY_WIDTH;
-	hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns;
 
-	rate = (rate + (hz / 2)) / hz;
+	/* Consider precision in PWM_SCALE_WIDTH rate calculation */
+	ns100 *= 100;
+	hz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(ns100, period_ns);
+	rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * 100, hz);
 
 	/*
 	 * Since the actual PWM divider is the register's frequency divider