linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 078/241] blk-throttle: make sure expire time isnt too big

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180319180754.432758367@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:05:43 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 078/241] blk-throttle: make sure expire time isnt too big

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>

[ Upstream commit 06cceedcca67a93ac7f7aa93bbd9980c7496d14e ]

cgroup could be throttled to a limit but when all cgroups cross high
limit, queue enters a higher state and so the group should be throttled
to a higher limit. It's possible the cgroup is sleeping because of
throttle and other cgroups don't dispatch IO any more. In this case,
nobody can trigger current downgrade/upgrade logic. To fix this issue,
we could either set up a timer to wakeup the cgroup if other cgroups are
idle or make sure this cgroup doesn't sleep too long. Setting up a timer
means we must change the timer very frequently. This patch chooses the
latter. Making cgroup sleep time not too big wouldn't change cgroup
bps/iops, but could make it wakeup more frequently, which isn't a big
issue because throtl_slice * 8 is already quite big.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 block/blk-throttle.c |   11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -499,6 +499,17 @@ static void throtl_dequeue_tg(struct thr
 static void throtl_schedule_pending_timer(struct throtl_service_queue *sq,
 					  unsigned long expires)
 {
+	unsigned long max_expire = jiffies + 8 * throtl_slice;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since we are adjusting the throttle limit dynamically, the sleep
+	 * time calculated according to previous limit might be invalid. It's
+	 * possible the cgroup sleep time is very long and no other cgroups
+	 * have IO running so notify the limit changes. Make sure the cgroup
+	 * doesn't sleep too long to avoid the missed notification.
+	 */
+	if (time_after(expires, max_expire))
+		expires = max_expire;
 	mod_timer(&sq->pending_timer, expires);
 	throtl_log(sq, "schedule timer. delay=%lu jiffies=%lu",
 		   expires - jiffies, jiffies);