[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180319180759.990889173@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:07:58 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, bartoldeman@...il.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 213/241] selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86: Exit with 1 if we fail
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
commit 327d53d005ca47b10eae940616ed11c569f75a9b upstream.
Fix a logic error that caused the test to exit with 0 even if test
cases failed.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: bartoldeman@...il.com
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b1cc37144038958a469c8f70a5f47a6a5638636a.1521003603.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ int main(void)
clearhandler(SIGSEGV);
/* Make sure nothing explodes if we fork. */
- if (fork() > 0)
+ if (fork() == 0)
return 0;
return (nerrs == 0 ? 0 : 1);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists