linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 1/2] Revert "led: core: Fix brightness setting when setting delay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27de6e0e-5f1a-d339-01b5-3ec27f8e56b6@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 20:29:11 +0100
From:   Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 1/2] Revert "led: core: Fix brightness setting when
 setting delay_off=0"

On 03/19/2018 02:37 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 08:31:01AM +0100, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> This reverts commit 86b9fa2190907f4f550d9d6bf490c5f89ca33836.
>>
>> The commit being reverted has two flaws:
>>  - it introduces a regression, fixed in the upstream
>>    commit 7b6af2c53192f1766892ef40c8f48a413509ed72.
>>  - it has truncated commit message
>> ---
>>  drivers/leds/led-core.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> I need a signed-off-by :(
> 
> And maybe a few "reported-by:" lines as well, that email thread seemed
> to have lots of people on it...

I've just sent v2.

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski