lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180319092458.GB12302@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:24:58 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:     Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: doc - clarify hash callbacks state machine

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 06:39:50AM +0000, Horia Geantă wrote:
>
> The fact that there can be multiple requests in parallel (for a given tfm) is a
> different topic.
> Each request object has its state in its own state machine, independent from the
> other request objects.
> I assume this is clear enough.

My point is that all of the state associated with a request needs
to be stored in the request object.  If you're start storing things
in the driver/hardware, then things will get ugly one way or another.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ