[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <48D2ECB8-4A95-4910-912C-67F17CA824EC@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:19:45 +0800
From: Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PM: Always check PME wakeup capability for runtime
wakeup support
> On Mar 19, 2018, at 6:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, March 18, 2018 8:12:15 PM CET Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>> USB controller ASM1042 stops working after commit de3ef1eb1cd0 ("PM /
>> core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info").
>>
>> The device in question is not power managed by platform firmware,
>> furthermore, it only supports PME# from D3cold:
>> Capabilities: [78] Power Management version 3
>> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=55mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold+)
>> Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
>
> That's somewhat unusual, but OK.
>
>> Before the commit, the device never gets runtime suspended. After the
>> commit, the device gets runtime suspended, so it does not respond to any
>> PME#.
>>
>> usb_hcd_pci_probe() mandatorily calls device_wakeup_enable(), hence
>> device_can_wakeup() in pci_dev_run_wake() always returns true.
>>
>> So pci_dev_run_wake() needs to check PME wakeup capability as its first
>> condition.
>>
>> Fixes: de3ef1eb1cd0 ("PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct
>> dev_pm_info")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.13+
>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pci.c | 11 ++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index f6a4dd10d9b0..e026d8f313ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -2125,16 +2125,13 @@ bool pci_dev_run_wake(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> struct pci_bus *bus = dev->bus;
>>
>> - if (device_can_wakeup(&dev->dev))
>> - return true;
>> -
>> - if (!dev->pme_support)
>> - return false;
>
> Why are you removing this check?
Because this is implicitly checked by pci_pme_capable().
But I guess it's better to keep it explicit.
I'll send a v2 to address this.
Kai-Heng
>
>> -
>> /* PME-capable in principle, but not from the target power state */
>> - if (!pci_pme_capable(dev, pci_target_state(dev, false)))
>> + if (!pci_pme_capable(dev, pci_target_state(dev, true)))
>> return false;
>>
>> + if (device_can_wakeup(&dev->dev))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> while (bus->parent) {
>> struct pci_dev *bridge = bus->self;
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists