[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdwmCr+OW-_DgKretCmTHc9oukODwN+Mw6FcaUuSD9nCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:12:51 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/21] eeprom: at24: use SPDX identifier instead of GPL boiler-plate
2018-03-19 12:03 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>:
> On 2018-03-19 10:17, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> Replace the GPL header with an SPDX identifier for GPL-2.0.
>
> Great care should be exercised when dealing with copyrights of others.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 7 ++-----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> index 2a4154eeb1bd..0e06201d33c9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> @@ -1,14 +1,11 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>
> This should be 2.0+
Indeed, thanks.
>
> Also, use a // style comment for the SPDX line in C files.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
I'm seeing both /* */ and // style comments used for SPDX headers - is
there any reason not to use /* */ here?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists