linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <410670D7E743164D87FA6160E7907A560113ABCA0A@am04wembxa.internal.synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:53:48 +0000
From:   Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>
To:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
CC:     "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in
 _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume

Hi,

On 3/19/2018 3:36 PM, Minas Harutyunyan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 3/19/2018 12:55 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com> writes:
>>>>>>>> Thanks for picking this for -next.
>>>>>>>> Is it better to have this in v4.16-rc fixes?
>>>>>>>> and also stable? v4.12+
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, there was no "Fixes: foobar" or "Cc: stable" lines in the commit
>>>>>>> log ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The best we can do now, is wait for -rc1 and manually send the commit to
>>>>>>> stable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's fine. Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Same issue seen in dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue() function where also used
>>>>> wait_event_lock_irq() - as result infinite loop.
>>>>
>>>> how did this happen? During rmmod dwc3? Or, perhaps, after you unloaded
>>>> a gadget driver?
>>>>
>>> No, not during rmmod's.
>>> We using our internal USB testing tool. Test case; ISOC OUT, transfer
>>> size N frames. When host starts ISOC OUT traffic then the dwc3 based on
>>> "Transfer not ready" event in frame F starts transfers staring from
>>> frame F+4 (for bInterval=1) as result 4 requests, which already queued
>>> on device side, remain incomplete. Function driver on some timeout
>>> trying dequeue these 4 requests (without disabling EP) to complete test.
>>> For IN ISOC's these requests completed on MISSED ISOC event, but for
>>> ISOC OUT required call dequeue on some timeout.
>>
>> okay
>>
>>>>> Actually to fix this issue I updated condition of wait function
>>>>> from:
>>>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING)
>>>>> to:
>>>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING & DWC3_EP_ENABLED)
>>>>
>>>> you're not fixing anything. You're, essentially, removing the entire
>>>> end transfer pending logic.
>>> yes, you are right, but how to overcome this infinite loop? Replace
>>> wait_event_lock_irq() by  wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout()?
>>
>> The best way here would be to figure why we're missing command complete
>> IRQ in those cases. According to documentation, we *should* receive that
>> interrupt, so why is it missing?
>>
> 
> Additional info on test. Core configuration is HS only mode, test speed
> HS, core version v2.90a. Maybe it will help to understand cause of issue.
> BTW, currently to pass above describe ISOC OUT test we just commented
> wait_event_lock_irq() in dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue() function and
> successfully received request completion in function driver.
> Thanks,
> Minas
> 

One more info: while function driver call dequeue, host periodically 
send control read command to get status of test from function - test In 
Progress or Finished.
Thanks,
Minas