[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180319142319.GA561@tigerII.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:23:19 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: Fix str_error_r() Werror=restrict build
On (03/19/18 11:16), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 02:55:04PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky escreveu:
> > Commit c8b5f2c96d1bf6c ("tools: Introduce str_error_r()") added
> > an str_error_r() wrapper which makes gcc8 unhappy due to
> > restrict-qualified parameter aliasing violation:
> >
> > ../lib/str_error_r.c: In function ‘str_error_r’:
> > ../lib/str_error_r.c:25:3: error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]
> > snprintf(buf, buflen, "INTERNAL ERROR: strerror_r(%d, %p, %zd)=%d", errnum, buf, buflen, err);
> > ^~~~~~~~
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> I applied Josh's patch, just printing '[buf]', that is good enough, I
> think.
Sure. Do you need the whole "strerror_r(%d, %p, %zd)" in this case?
Seems that printing out just `errnum' should be good enough.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists