linux-kernel - Re: use generic dma-direct and swiotlb code for x86 V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:56:24 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
cc:     x86@...nel.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@...ix.org>,
        Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: use generic dma-direct and swiotlb code for x86 V3

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> this series switches the x86 code the the dma-direct implementation
> for direct (non-iommu) dma and the generic swiotlb ops.  This includes
> getting rid of the special ops for the AMD memory encryption case and
> the STA2x11 SOC.  The generic implementations are based on the x86
> code, so they provide the same functionality.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>