[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180319152442.GA27915@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:24:42 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, x86@...nel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@...ix.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] dma-direct: handle the memory encryption bit in
common code
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:19:04PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> As a heads-up, I've just realised there's now a silent (but build-breaking)
> conflict with the current arm64 queue brewing here, as we've unfortunately
> had to reintroduce ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA as a means of being safe against an
> ugly architectural corner case - currently commit 1f85b42a691c ("arm64:
> Revert L1_CACHE_SHIFT back to 6 (64-byte cache line size)") in -next.
Please revert that arm64 commit. This condition should be handled
in common code as it is not arm specific. And next time please CC
the iommu list and dma-mapping maintainers before doing such a change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists