linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] sysctl: Add flags to support min/max range clamping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <35f54e8f-b80e-aa3b-b008-79ba7ca3bff2@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:39:19 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] sysctl: Add flags to support min/max range
 clamping

On 03/16/2018 09:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 02:13:42PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> When the CTL_FLAGS_CLAMP_RANGE flag is set in the ctl_table
>> entry, any update from the userspace will be clamped to the given
>> range without error if either the proc_dointvec_minmax() or the
>> proc_douintvec_minmax() handlers is used.
> I don't get it.  Why define a generic range flag when we can be mores specific and
> you do that in your next patch. What's the point of this flag then?
>
>   Luis

I was thinking about using the signed/unsigned bits as just annotations
for ranges for future extension. For the purpose of this patchset alone,
I can merge the three bits into just two.

Cheers,
Longman