linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] pci: host: pci-hyperv: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in hv_pci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SN6PR2101MB0893202C038AB406C6A6546BA0D40@SN6PR2101MB0893.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:52:08 +0000
From:   KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC:     "devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] pci: host: pci-hyperv: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with
 GFP_KERNEL in hv_pci_onchannelcallback



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 7:53 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; bhelgaas@...gle.com
> Cc: devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pci: host: pci-hyperv: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with
> GFP_KERNEL in hv_pci_onchannelcallback
> 
> hv_pci_onchannelcallback() is not called in atomic context.
> 
> The call chain ending up at hv_pci_onchannelcallback() is:
> [1] hv_pci_onchannelcallback() <- hv_pci_probe()
> hv_pci_probe() is only set as ".probe" in hv_driver
> structure "hv_pci_drv".

This function is setup as the function to handle interrupts on the channel. Hence the
need for GFP_ATOMIC.

K. Y
> 
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> hv_pci_onchannelcallback() calls kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which waits busily for allocation.
> GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL
> to avoid busy waiting.
> 
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> index 0fe3ea1..c5c8a99 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -1887,7 +1887,7 @@ static void hv_pci_onchannelcallback(void
> *context)
>  	struct pci_dev_incoming *dev_message;
>  	struct hv_pci_dev *hpdev;
> 
> -	buffer = kmalloc(bufferlen, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	buffer = kmalloc(bufferlen, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!buffer)
>  		return;
> 
> @@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ static void hv_pci_onchannelcallback(void
> *context)
>  			kfree(buffer);
>  			/* Handle large packet */
>  			bufferlen = bytes_recvd;
> -			buffer = kmalloc(bytes_recvd, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +			buffer = kmalloc(bytes_recvd, GFP_KERNEL);
>  			if (!buffer)
>  				return;
>  			continue;
> --
> 1.9.1