[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180321103408.49e62310@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 10:34:08 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the sparc-next tree with the arm64 tree
Hi David,
Today's linux-next merge of the sparc-next tree got a conflict in:
arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
between commit:
266da65e9156 ("signal: Add FPE_FLTUNK si_code for undiagnosable fp exceptions")
from the arm64 tree and commit:
d84bb709aa4a ("signals, sparc: Add signal codes for ADI violations")
from the sparc-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
index d2884e951bb5,838a4dc90a6d..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
@@@ -26,8 -26,8 +26,8 @@@ static inline void signal_compat_build_
* new fields are handled in copy_siginfo_to_user32()!
*/
BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGILL != 11);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGFPE != 13);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGFPE != 14);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGSEGV != 4);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGSEGV != 7);
BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGBUS != 5);
BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGTRAP != 4);
BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGCHLD != 6);
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists