linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 109/219] clk: sunxi-ng: a33: Add offset and minimum value for DDR1 PLL N factor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v67rPBSPy8e8CXtWzwKW8eeqjj=JyTnYPNH5mJ01yB7haw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:10:42 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 109/219] clk: sunxi-ng: a33: Add offset
 and minimum value for DDR1 PLL N factor

Hi,

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Sasha Levin
<Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>
> [ Upstream commit 68f37d862403e8f95337b2eca90af15d0b8cd5d7 ]
>
> The DDR1 PLL on the A33 is an oddball amongst the A33 CCU clocks.
> It is a clock multiplier, with the effective multiplier in the
> range of 12 ~ 255 and no offset between the multiplier value and
> the value programmed into the register.
>
> Implement the zero offset and minimum value of 12 for this clock.
>
> Fixes: d05c748bd730 ("clk: sunxi-ng: Add A33 CCU support")
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-a33.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-a33.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-a33.c
> index e1dc4e5b34e1..bdbaf26f551f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-a33.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-a33.c
> @@ -159,13 +159,17 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK(pll_de_clk, "pll-de",
>                                         BIT(28),        /* lock */
>                                         CLK_SET_RATE_UNGATE);
>
> -/* TODO: Fix N */
> -static SUNXI_CCU_N_WITH_GATE_LOCK(pll_ddr1_clk, "pll-ddr1",
> -                                 "osc24M", 0x04c,
> -                                 8, 6,                 /* N */
> -                                 BIT(31),              /* gate */
> -                                 BIT(28),              /* lock */
> -                                 CLK_SET_RATE_UNGATE);
> +static struct ccu_mult pll_ddr1_clk = {
> +       .enable = BIT(31),
> +       .lock   = BIT(28),

As you undoubtedly noticed, this does not build. It needs commit
cf719012b232 ("clk: sunxi-ng: mult: Support PLL lock detection")
to be applied first. They were part of the same series.

Incidentally, how can we note these kinds of dependencies to make
life easier for stable kernel maintainers?

Thanks
ChenYu

> +       .mult   = _SUNXI_CCU_MULT_OFFSET_MIN_MAX(8, 6, 0, 12, 0),
> +       .common = {
> +               .reg            = 0x04c,
> +               .hw.init        = CLK_HW_INIT("pll-ddr1", "osc24M",
> +                                             &ccu_mult_ops,
> +                                             CLK_SET_RATE_UNGATE),
> +       },
> +};
>
>  static const char * const cpux_parents[] = { "osc32k", "osc24M",
>                                              "pll-cpux" , "pll-cpux" };
> --
> 2.14.1