[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180320023857.1885-1-gniibe@fsij.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:38:53 +0900
From: NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe@...j.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gniibe@...j.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Unblocked by fake_signal_wake_up then real signal
Hello,
Background:
I tried to fix my own problem in suspend-to-ram with USB devices (some
device doesn't work well after suspend/resume). I know it's common
problems. Well, while I identified some problems of USB devices and
drivers, I did try my best. I fixed a USB device implementation of
mine. Then, I also located and fixed bugs in a USB user space driver
which I maintain.
Now, I think I found a kernel problem. After suspend/resume, in my
USB user space driver, a task sends a signal to another task, then,
pselect is unblocked by the signal. In this situation, a signal
handler is called correctly, but it seems that the pselect is
restarted. Expected behavior is unblocked pselect returning -EINTR.
Looking the code, my theory is:
It is a fake signal by suspend which unblocks pselect to be frozen,
and after resume, real signal is sent. When both of signals are
handled in a single call of exit_to_usermode_loop, by two calls of
do_signal, firstly for fake signal and secondly for real signal, the
system call is restarted wrongly, where it should return -EINTR.
Here is a patch series of mine for x86. I'd suggest architecture
maintainers to do similar if an architecture supports suspend/resume.
NIIBE Yutaka (4):
signal/x86: Factor out nosig handling.
signal/x86: do_signal: syscall restart should be done only once.
signal/x86: Move nosig handling at the end of exit_to_usermode_loop.
signal/x86: Move restore_saved_sigmask().
arch/x86/entry/common.c | 6 +++++-
arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists