[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1521515960.2284.1.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:19:20 +0800
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] thermal: Add cooling device's statistics in sysfs
On 二, 2018-03-20 at 09:38 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14-03-18, 13:44, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > I got those warnings as well, and I quietly ignored them :)
> >
> > I ignored the renaming part for the sake of consistency. The other
> > existing
> > routines for similar purpose are named as:
> >
> > thermal_cooling_device_type_show
> > thermal_cooling_device_max_state_show
> > thermal_cooling_device_cur_state_show
> > thermal_cooling_device_cur_state_store
> >
> > for me it made more sense to follow that naming convention. And I
> > didn't use the
> > _RO and _WO variants for the same reason.
> >
> > Now here is what I propose now:
> >
> > - You apply this patch as-is and ignore the warning.
> >
> > - I will send few patches on top of that to do:
> > - renaming of all such routines to shorter versions.
> > - Use the _RO or _WO variants of the macro everywhere.
> >
> > What do you say ?
> @Zhang: Can you please share the way you want this to get merged ?
> And if the
> above is fine with you ?
>
yes, it works for me.
I will apply the patch later today.
thanks,
rui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists