linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] update Mediatek MT2712 clock and scpsys support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <152153061465.254778.3061562183948751301@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:23:34 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        srv_heupstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] update Mediatek MT2712 clock and scpsys support

Quoting Weiyi Lu (2018-03-19 23:07:48)
> On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 15:03 +0800, Weiyi Lu wrote:
> > This series is based on v4.16-rc1 and composed of scpsys control (PATCH 1-2) and clock control (PATCH 3-5).
> > Basically, all changes are for the ECO design change of MT2712.
> > 
> > changes since v1:
> > - Avoid renumbering clocks. Append new clocks at the bottom of each own subsystem.
> > 
> Hi Matthias & Stephen,
> 
> Sorry to bother. Just saw patch 1/2 are already pushed to v4.16-next-soc
> and patch 3/5 are applied onto clk-next. What about the patch 4(arm64:
> dts: add clock device nodes of MT2712). Does there any problem remain or
> it cause some problems? Many thanks.

Patch 4 can go via arm-soc? I'm not planning to apply that patch.