[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180320084412.GA16337@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:44:12 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@...ix.org>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: use generic dma-direct and swiotlb code for x86 V3
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:37:51AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git dma-direct-x86
>
> Btw., what's the upstreaming route for these patches?
>
> While it's a multi-arch series it's all pretty x86-heavy as well so we can host it
> in -tip (in tip:core/dma or such), but feel free to handle it yourself as well:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Either way is fine with me. The dma-mapping tree is pretty light this
cycles, so I don't expect any conflicts. If you want it feel free to grab
it, otherwise I'll queue it up.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists