[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ipVHsjEBJuj3Lz6iRSVasv8d2YY0qjz1SFaCK+zDP=Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:41:49 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...ica.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xen/acpi: upload _PSD info for non Dom0 CPUs too
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com> wrote:
> On 03/15/2018 03:45 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 03/15/2018 10:22 AM, Joao Martins wrote:
>>> All uploaded PM data from non-dom0 CPUs takes the info from vCPU 0 and
>>> changing only the acpi_id. For processors which P-state coordination type
>>> is HW_ALL (0xFD) it is OK to upload bogus P-state dependency information
>>> (_PSD), because Xen will ignore any cpufreq domains created for past CPUs.
>>>
>>> Albeit for platforms which expose coordination types as SW_ANY or SW_ALL,
>>> this will have some unintended side effects. Effectively, it will look at
>>> the P-state domain existence and *if it already exists* it will skip the
>>> acpi-cpufreq initialization and thus inherit the policy from the first CPU
>>> in the cpufreq domain. This will finally lead to the original cpu not
>>> changing target freq to P0 other than the first in the domain. Which will
>>> make turbo boost not getting enabled (e.g. for 'performance' governor) for
>>> all cpus.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes that, by also evaluating _PSD when we enumerate all ACPI
>>> processors and thus always uploading the correct info to Xen. We export
>>> acpi_processor_get_psd() for that this purpose, but change signature
>>> to not assume an existent of acpi_processor given that ACPI isn't creating
>>> an acpi_processor for non-dom0 CPUs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>>
> Thanks!
>
> I suppose what's remaining is review (or ack) from ACPI folks on the interface
> changes made to acpi_processor_get_psd().
There you go:
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Do you want to route this via Xen?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists