linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: xgifb: XGI_main

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180320112053.zxudtqeemedogcel@mwanda>
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:20:53 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Pratik Jain <pratik.jain0509@...il.com>
Cc:     arnaud.patard@...-net.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: xgifb: XGI_main_26.c: Refactored the function

I'm trying to review this, but I feel like this makes it slightly more
complicated for no reason.  Why break it up into two loops?

> -		i++;
> +		++i;

These are equivalent, so you should default to accepting the original
author's style.  Otherwise the next person to touch this code will just
change it back and we get into a cycle of pointless changes.

regards,
dan carpenter