lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1521549165-6216-3-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 05:32:40 -0700
From:   kan.liang@...el.com
To:     peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH V7 3/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check in generic code

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>

There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED. The only
exception is client IMC uncore. It has customized function to deal with
the 'UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 1' case. It does not touch the generic code.
For generic code, it is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
The code quality issue will bring problem when new counter index is
introduced.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
---

No changes since V6.

 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index a7956fc..3b0f93e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void uncore_perf_event_update(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *e
 	u64 prev_count, new_count, delta;
 	int shift;
 
-	if (event->hw.idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
+	if (event->hw.idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
 		shift = 64 - uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box);
 	else
 		shift = 64 - uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box);
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ