lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180320123918.GS4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:39:18 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/smpboot: Make the check code more clear in
 prefill_possible_map()

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:04:30PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> case 1: no  | no  | no | -->  min (setup_possible_cpus, nr_cpu_ids, setup_max_cpus)
> case 2: no  | no  | yes| -->  min (setup_possible_cpus, nr_cpu_ids)
> case 3: no  | yes | no | -->  1                                    
> case 4: no  | yes | yes| -->  1
> case 5: yes | no  | no | -->  min (num_processors, nr_cpu_ids, setup_max_cpus)
> case 6: yes | no  | yes| -->  min (num_processors + disabled_cpus, nr_cpu_ids)
> case 7: yes | yes | no | -->  1 
> case 8: yes | yes | yes| -->  1

The case number is off by one ;-)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ