linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] livepatch: Atomic replace feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1803201413480.1312@pobox.suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:16:05 +0100 (CET)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To:     Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@...tuozzo.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] livepatch: Atomic replace feature

On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Joe Lawrence wrote:

> These are the callback tests that I hacked up into a livepatch
> kselftest.  (Basically I copied a bunch of the sample modules and
> verified the expected dmesg output as I had listed in in the
> Documentation/livepatch/callbacks.txt file.)  The script is still a
> little rough and maybe this isn't the direction we want to go for proper
> kselftests, but perhaps it saves you some time/sanity for verifying this
> patchset.
> 
> Hope this helps,

Hi Joe,

it helps a lot. Thanks for implementing it.

Miroslav