[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152156543724.183971.9703906314447360197@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:03:57 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/42] dt-bindings: clock: New bindings for TI Davinci PSC
Quoting David Lechner (2018-03-15 19:52:25)
> This adds a new binding for the Power Sleep Controller (PSC) for the
> mach-davinci family of processors.
>
> Note: Although TI Keystone has a very similar PSC, we are not using the
> existing bindings. Keystone is using a legacy one-node-per-clock binding
> (actually two nodes if you count the separate reset binding for the same
> IP block). Also, some davinci LPSCs have quirks that aren't handled by
> the keystone bindings, so we would be adding one compatible string per
> clock with quirks instead of just a new compatible string for each
> controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists