[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152156541626.183971.14116213325024297115@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:03:36 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/42] clk: davinci: New driver for davinci PLL clocks
Quoting David Lechner (2018-03-15 19:52:18)
> This adds a new driver for mach-davinci PLL clocks. This is porting the
> code from arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c to the common clock framework.
> Additionally, it adds device tree support for these clocks.
>
> The ifeq ($(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK), y) in the Makefile is needed to prevent
> compile errors until the clock code in arch/arm/mach-davinci is removed.
>
> Note: although there are similar clocks for TI Keystone we are not able
> to share the code for a few reasons. The keystone clocks are device tree
> only and use legacy one-node-per-clock bindings. Also the register
> layouts are a bit different, which would add even more if/else mess
> to the keystone clocks. And the keystone PLL driver doesn't support
> setting clock rates.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists