[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002901d3c074$2e315280$8a93f780$@net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:52:12 -0700
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
To: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: "'Frederic Weisbecker'" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"'Paul McKenney'" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"'Thomas Ilsche'" <thomas.ilsche@...dresden.de>,
"'Rik van Riel'" <riel@...riel.com>,
"'Aubrey Li'" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"'Mike Galbraith'" <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"'Linux PM'" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
Subject: RE: [RFT][PATCH v7 3/8] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop
I am just trying to catch up. Switching to 4.16-rc6 and
this new patch set.
I think this patch 3/8 is incorrect, and is actually
patch 2/8 repeated.
I'll see if I can just apply the old v5 patch 3/7,
and move on.
On 2018.03.20 08:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...[snip]...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists