[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0g-hrTBBT_Uk-1H4f=N2dNnUig2-qUiQW89ejaCoME0Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:01:49 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@...dresden.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v7 3/8] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in
the idle loop
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net> wrote:
> I am just trying to catch up. Switching to 4.16-rc6 and
> this new patch set.
>
> I think this patch 3/8 is incorrect, and is actually
> patch 2/8 repeated.
Yes, it is, sorry about that.
I've just sent the correct one in a reply to this message.
> I'll see if I can just apply the old v5 patch 3/7,
> and move on.
It should apply, it hasn't changed since v5.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists