[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM2PR0201MB07679A2DF21F254ACD5E0417B8AB0@DM2PR0201MB0767.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:29:58 +0000
From: Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@...inx.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@...inx.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejas Patel <TEJASP@...inx.com>,
"Shubhrajyoti Datta" <shubhraj@...inx.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: clk: Add clk_get_children support
Hi Stephan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Boyd [mailto:sboyd@...nel.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 11:22 AM
> To: Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@...inx.com>; linux-clk@...r.kernel.org;
> mark.rutland@....com; michal.simek@...inx.com; mturquette@...libre.com;
> robh+dt@...nel.org; sboyd@...eaurora.org
> Cc: Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@...inx.com>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Jolly Shah
> <JOLLYS@...inx.com>; Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@...inx.com>; Tejas Patel
> <TEJASP@...inx.com>; Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhraj@...inx.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: clk: Add clk_get_children support
>
> Quoting Jolly Shah (2018-02-28 14:27:39)
> > From: Jolly Shah <jolly.shah@...inx.com>
> >
> > This API helps to determine the users for any clock.
>
> Ok, but why do you need it?
As you suggested in other patch, we will move children validation in FW.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jolly Shah <jollys@...inx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tejas Patel <tejasp@...inx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/clk.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index
> > 0f686a9..947a18b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -274,6 +274,34 @@ struct clk_hw *clk_hw_get_parent(const struct
> > clk_hw *hw) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_hw_get_parent);
> >
> > +static unsigned int sibling;
>
> Looks very thread unsafe!
>
> > +
> > +static void clk_show_subtree(struct clk_core *c,
> > + int level) {
> > + struct clk_core *child;
> > +
> > + if (!c)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (level == 1)
> > + sibling++;
> > +
> > + hlist_for_each_entry(child, &c->children, child_node)
> > + clk_show_subtree(child, level + 1); }
> > +
> > +unsigned int clk_get_children(char *name) {
> > + struct clk_core *core;
> > + struct clk *pclk = __clk_lookup(name);
> > +
> > + sibling = 0;
> > + core = pclk->core;
> > + clk_show_subtree(core, 0);
> > + return sibling;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct clk_core *__clk_lookup_subtree(const char *name,
> > struct clk_core *core) {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> > b/include/linux/clk-provider.h index f711be6..e94dfb2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> > @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ unsigned int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk
> > *clk); unsigned long clk_hw_get_rate(const struct clk_hw *hw);
> > unsigned long __clk_get_flags(struct clk *clk); unsigned long
> > clk_hw_get_flags(const struct clk_hw *hw);
> > +unsigned int clk_get_children(char *name);
>
> And uses a string lookup instead of having the clk_hw pointer in hand.
> No thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists