[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803201325530.167205@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, page_alloc: wakeup kcompactd even if kswapd cannot
free more memory
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Kswapd will not wakeup if per-zone watermarks are not failing or if too
> > many previous attempts at background reclaim have failed.
> >
> > This can be true if there is a lot of free memory available. For high-
> > order allocations, kswapd is responsible for waking up kcompactd for
> > background compaction. If the zone is now below its watermarks or
> not ?
>
Good catch, Andrew please let me know if you would like a resend to
correct this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists