linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 18:01:31 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net,
        efault@....de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default
 hierarchy

On 03/20/2018 05:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 04:53:37PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> ASAIK for v2, when cpuset.cpus is empty, cpuset.effective_cpus will show
>> all the cpus available from the parent. It is a different behavior from
>> v1. So do we still need a cpuset.cpus_available?
> Heh, you're right.  Let's forget about available and do
> cpuset.cpus.effective.  The primary reason for suggesting that was
> because of the similarity with cgroup.controllers and
> cgroup.subtree_control; however, they're that way because
> subtree_control is delegatable.  For a normal resource knob like
> cpuset.cpus, the knob is owned by the parent and what's interesting to
> the parent is its effective set that it's distributing from.

OK, will change the names as suggested.

-Longman