| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180320160445.4cb838cc@t450s.home>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:04:45 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: "Jason Cai (Xiang Feng)" <jason.cai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
gnehzuil@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio iommu type1: improve memory pinning process for
raw PFN mapping
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:33:23 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:30:24 +0800
> "Jason Cai (Xiang Feng)" <jason.cai@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> > When using vfio to pass through a PCIe device (e.g. a GPU card) that
> > has a huge BAR (e.g. 16GB), a lot of cycles are wasted on memory
> > pinning because PFNs of PCI BAR are not backed by struct page, and
> > the corresponding VMA has flag VM_PFNMAP.
> >
> > With this change, when pinning a region which is a raw PFN mapping,
> > it can skip unnecessary user memory pinning process, and thus, can
> > significantly improve VM's boot up time when passing through devices
> > via VFIO. In my test on a Xeon E5 2.6GHz, the time mapping a 16GB
> > BAR was reduced from about 0.4s to 1.5us.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Cai (Xiang Feng) <jason.cai@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > index 45657e2b1ff7..0658f35318b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > @@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> > {
> > unsigned long pfn = 0;
> > long ret, pinned = 0, lock_acct = 0;
> > - bool rsvd;
> > dma_addr_t iova = vaddr - dma->vaddr + dma->iova;
> >
> > /* This code path is only user initiated */
> > @@ -408,14 +407,22 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + if (is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base)) {
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > + down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> > + vma = find_vma_intersection(current->mm, vaddr, vaddr + 1);
> > + pinned = min(npage, (long)vma_pages(vma));
> > + up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> > + return pinned;
> > + }
> > +
> > pinned++;
> > - rsvd = is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base);
> >
> > /*
> > * Reserved pages aren't counted against the user, externally pinned
> > * pages are already counted against the user.
> > */
> > - if (!rsvd && !vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova)) {
> > + if (!vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova)) {
> > if (!lock_cap && current->mm->locked_vm + 1 > limit) {
> > put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
> > pr_warn("%s: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n", __func__,
> > @@ -435,13 +442,12 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> > if (ret)
> > break;
> >
> > - if (pfn != *pfn_base + pinned ||
> > - rsvd != is_invalid_reserved_pfn(pfn)) {
> > + if (pfn != *pfn_base + pinned) {
> > put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!rsvd && !vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova)) {
> > + if (!vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova)) {
> > if (!lock_cap &&
> > current->mm->locked_vm + lock_acct + 1 > limit) {
> > put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
> > @@ -459,10 +465,8 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> >
> > unpin_out:
> > if (ret) {
> > - if (!rsvd) {
> > - for (pfn = *pfn_base ; pinned ; pfn++, pinned--)
> > - put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
> > - }
> > + for (pfn = *pfn_base ; pinned ; pfn++, pinned--)
> > + put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Something is wrong with your mail setup, the patch looks normal above,
> but when I view the source or save it to try to apply it, the diff is
> corrupt, as below. It looks like maybe you're pasting the patch into
> your mailer and it's wrapping lines (ending with '=') and actual '='
> are replaced with '=3D' and tabs are converted to spaces. Please fix
> your mailer and resend. Thanks,
Actually, it's even a little more strange, the copies I received via
the kvm and lkml mailing lists don't have the line wrapping and
character conversion, but the tab to space conversion is still there,
which is what caused me to suspect a copy-paste into the mailer.
Between the headers, I see the direct copy has:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
While the list copy has:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Perhaps the list is automatically fixing some part of the problem.
Thanks,
Alex
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c =
> b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 45657e2b1ff7..0658f35318b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma =
> *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> {
> unsigned long pfn =3D 0;
> long ret, pinned =3D 0, lock_acct =3D 0;
> - bool rsvd;
> dma_addr_t iova =3D vaddr - dma->vaddr + dma->iova;
>
> /* This code path is only user initiated */
> @@ -408,14 +407,22 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma =
> *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + if (is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base)) {
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> + vma =3D find_vma_intersection(current->mm, vaddr, vaddr =
> + 1);
> + pinned =3D min(npage, (long)vma_pages(vma));
> + up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> + return pinned;
> + }
> +
> pinned++;
> - rsvd =3D is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base);
>
> /*
> * Reserved pages aren't counted against the user, externally =
> pinned
> * pages are already counted against the user.
> */
> - if (!rsvd && !vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova)) {
> + if (!vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova)) {
> if (!lock_cap && current->mm->locked_vm + 1 > limit) {
> put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
> pr_warn("%s: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n", =
> __func__,
> @@ -435,13 +442,12 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma =
> *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> if (ret)
> break;
>
> - if (pfn !=3D *pfn_base + pinned ||
> - rsvd !=3D is_invalid_reserved_pfn(pfn)) {
> + if (pfn !=3D *pfn_base + pinned) {
> put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
> break;
> }
>
> - if (!rsvd && !vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova)) {
> + if (!vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova)) {
> if (!lock_cap &&
> current->mm->locked_vm + lock_acct + 1 > =
> limit) {
> put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
> @@ -459,10 +465,8 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma =
> *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
>
> unpin_out:
> if (ret) {
> - if (!rsvd) {
> - for (pfn =3D *pfn_base ; pinned ; pfn++, =
> pinned--)
> - put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
> - }
> + for (pfn =3D *pfn_base ; pinned ; pfn++, pinned--)
> + put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.13.6
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists