[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180321143120.6d9bbe0f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:31:20 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the security tree
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the selinux tree got a conflict in:
security/selinux/hooks.c
between commit:
6b4f3d01052a ("usb, signal, security: only pass the cred, not the secid, to kill_pid_info_as_cred and security_task_kill")
from the security tree and commit:
6b6bc6205d98 ("selinux: wrap AVC state")
from the selinux tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc security/selinux/hooks.c
index fdd523e575e3,21b377aef69a..000000000000
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@@ -4050,11 -4164,10 +4170,12 @@@ static int selinux_task_kill(struct tas
perm = PROCESS__SIGNULL; /* null signal; existence test */
else
perm = signal_to_av(sig);
- if (!secid)
+ if (!cred)
secid = current_sid();
+ else
+ secid = cred_sid(cred);
- return avc_has_perm(secid, task_sid(p), SECCLASS_PROCESS, perm, NULL);
+ return avc_has_perm(&selinux_state,
+ secid, task_sid(p), SECCLASS_PROCESS, perm, NULL);
}
static void selinux_task_to_inode(struct task_struct *p,
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists