[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00fd0e10-2c64-7a19-dd01-ec1a4440933d@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:40:22 +0000
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, mjw@...oraproject.org,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cary Coutant <ccoutant@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Salted build ids via linker sections
Hi Laura,
> This is an implementation of the counter proposal. If an environment variable
> is set, that value gets added as a .comment section to the necessary binaries.
This is not really my purview but ... can I just say that I really do not like
using environment variables to control build behaviour. It makes reproducing a
build much harder. Especially when you are trying to reproduce a bug report from
a user who does not even know that the environment variable exits.
Cheers
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists