[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1dfcdb3d-6a92-8654-7cc4-ef262ddb0915@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:41:45 +0800
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <corbet@....net>,
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <lenb@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/smpboot: Add the missing description of
possible_cpus
At 03/21/2018 05:34 PM, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> At 03/21/2018 05:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:33:24PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
>>> How about:
>>>
>>> possible_cpus= [s390,x86_64] Set the number of possible CPUs which
>>> are determined by the ACPI tables MADT or mptables by
>>> default. possible_cpus=n : n >= 1 enforces the possible
>>> number to be 'n'.
>>> While nr_cpus is also be set: nr_cpus=m, choice the
>>> minimum one for the number of possible CPUs.
>>
>> So what is the exact difference between possible_cpus and nr_cpus ? I
>
> the possible_cpus= can reset the number of possible CPUs, even bigger
> than 'num_processors + disabled_cpus', But nr_cpus= can't.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the maximum number kernel gets from ACPI/mptables, no matter what
number nr_cpus= is, the number of possible CPUs will not bigger than it.
>
>> konw maxcpus= limits the number of CPUs we bring up, and possible_cpus
>> limits the possible_map, but I'm not entirely sure what nr_cpus does
>> here.
>>
>
> nr_cpus can limited the maximum CPUs that the kernel could support.
>
> Here is a double check in case of using them at the same time, even if I
> think just using possible_cpus= is enough. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> dou.
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists