[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180321151837.GC16308@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:18:37 +0000
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
ckadabi@...eaurora.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jnair@...iumnetworks.com,
robin.murphy@....com, shankerd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/22] arm64: capabilities: Change scope of VHE to
Boot CPU feature
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:51:13AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> We expect all CPUs to be running at the same EL inside the kernel
> with or without VHE enabled and we have strict checks to ensure
> that any mismatch triggers a kernel panic. If VHE is enabled,
> we use the feature based on the boot CPU and all other CPUs
> should follow. This makes it a perfect candidate for a cpability
Nit: capability (not worth fixing unless you respin for some other
reason though.)
> based on the boot CPU, which should be matched by all the CPUs
> (both when is ON and OFF). This saves us some not-so-pretty
> hooks and special code, just for verifying the conflict.
>
> The patch also makes the VHE capability entry depend on
> CONFIG_ARM64_VHE.
>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists