[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW+OzGYK7zj+-jWmZwMcve7=C5gGamgH9jmdgqJ7NC7Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:43:26 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Use after free with pinctrl_enable() and devm_pinctrl_register_and_init()
Hi Linus, Tony,
If claiming hogs failed, pinctrl_enable() frees the pctldev, and
destroys its mutex.
However, if the pin controller is registered using
devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(), device resource management will call
pinctrl_unregister() later. This will access the destroyed pctldev,
which may crash the system.
With poisoning enabled (CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y), the crash is imminent:
sh-pfc e6050000.pin-controller: function 'foo' not supported
sh-pfc e6050000.pin-controller: invalid function a in map table
sh-pfc e6050000.pin-controller: error claiming hogs: -22
sh-pfc e6050000.pin-controller: could not claim hogs: -22
Unhandled fault: alignment exception (0x001) at 0x6b6b6c2f
pgd = 581794e0
[6b6b6c2f] *pgd=00000000
Internal error: : 1 [#1] SMP ARM
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.16.0-rc5-kzm9g-00484-gb3469948b11d02a0-dirty #1043
Hardware name: Generic SH73A0 (Flattened Device Tree)
PC is at __lock_acquire+0xd8/0x1bf0
LR is at lock_acquire+0x98/0xb8
pc : [<c016fc84>] lr : [<c0171f80>] psr: 20000093
sp : df441be8 ip : df441c80 fp : 00000000
r10: 00000000 r9 : 00000001 r8 : 00000000
r7 : 00000000 r6 : c1084170 r5 : df5586e8 r4 : df43e040
r3 : 6b6b6c2f r2 : 6b6b6b6b r1 : 00000000 r0 : 6b6b6b6b
Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none
Control: 10c5387d Table: 4000404a DAC: 00000051
Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, stack limit = 0x2557051f)
Stack: (0xdf441be8 to 0xdf442000)
...
[<c016fc84>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0171f80>] (lock_acquire+0x98/0xb8)
[<c0171f80>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0598888>] (__mutex_lock+0x7c/0x9ec)
[<c0598888>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0599210>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20)
[<c0599210>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c034cd18>]
(pinctrl_unregister+0x48/0x158)
[<c034cd18>] (pinctrl_unregister) from [<c03b3f30>]
(release_nodes+0x218/0x25c)
[<c03b3f30>] (release_nodes) from [<c03b08ac>]
(driver_probe_device+0x200/0x318)
[<c03b08ac>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c03aedd8>]
(bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xb8)
My first idea was to add a !devres_find(pctldev->dev, devm_pinctrl_dev_release,
NULL, NULL) check to the error path of pinctrl_enable(), which seems
to work(TM).
However, that's still not 100% correct and sufficient:
- pinctrl_unregister() will do some cleanup (pinctrldev_list and debugfs) that
should not be done,
- When using pinctrl_register() or devm_pinctrl_register(), and
pinctrl_enable() fails, all other cleanup done in pinctrl_unregister()
never happens.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists